Evaluation of the Quality of Scientific Publishing Vessels in Arab Countries

the First International Academic Conference

Evaluation of the Quality of Scientific Publishing Vessels in Arab Countries

Reality and Intention

Germany; Berlin 01-02/04/2019


Vision:

Broadcasting of research results, studies, reports and scientific books is necessary to spread knowledge and contribute to its cumulative crystallization. In this regard, universities, research laboratories, research centers and researchers are seeking to publish their scientific research within the various academic publishing tools that adopt scientific standards, such as specialized scientific journals or books for the purpose of exchanging knowledge and results to ensure the effectiveness of studies and research and the integration of its results and to achieve its objectives. Scientific journals and specialized journals are a source of scientific information. Scientific publishing is one of the most important mechanisms for enriching scientific knowledge and knowledge exchange, as well as publishing houses in the classification of universities and scientific and research institutions and arranging them on the Arab and international levels. although the quantitative rate of scientific publication is very important, the scientific and academic value of research and studies, and the value of the vessels in which it is published is of more importance. This is why all scientific centers and institutions are concerned about the scientific value of the studies published

Despite the efforts and energies to upgrade the academic publishing vessels in the Arab countries, they are confronted with many challenges and obstacles, which are mainly the failure of the publishing vessels in Arab countries to comply with internationally recognized standards. This has negatively affected their classification in international journals that have laboratories High Impact. This is in addition to the monopoly of specific institutions for the classification of journals and periodicals based on unfair and impossible conditions which may not be related to the quality of scientific publishing, which has deprived them of this right, especially that the attempts made in this area are still useless and their effects are very limited In the absence of confidence of academics.

This poses a challenge as long as it exists, finding suitable scientific tools for the dissemination of scientific and research production, regardless of the publication model it adopts. With databases that classify reliable vessels and measure their performance levels based on clear criteria such as editorial level, commitment to peer arbitration, and the number of readings and citations obtained by periodicals and books, the potential audience may have these tools and others to select the appropriate vessels to disseminate their scientific output.

Problem Discussed:

What are the criteria for evaluating the quality of scientific publishing vessels in the Arab countries, and to what extent can objective criteria be formulated that contribute to the promotion of publishing tools and means to keep abreast of the scientific production published in the Arab countries?

Objectives:

  • Evaluating the reality of scientific publishing in Arab countries and looking forward to its future
  • Determination of the shortcomings in the scientific publishing system in Arab countries and ways of addressing them.
  • Determining the global standards for evaluating the publishing vessels and their role in promoting scientific research.
  • Introducing pilot experiments in the evaluation of scientific publishing vessels.
  • Submission of proposals to upgrade the system of evaluation of scientific publishing vessels in Arab countries.

 Panels:

  • Panel One: Theoretical Concepts of Quality of Scientific Publications in Arab Countries
  • Panel Two: The role of ethical standards in scientific publishing in the promotion of publishing vessels in the Arab world.
  • Panel Three: Ways and means of evaluating the publishing vessels in the Arab countries
  • Panel Four: The Effect of the Global Classification of Universities on Publishing Containers in the Arab World.
  • Panel Five: Scientific publishing of scientific journals and contemporary technologies.
  • Panel Six: Arab and international experiences in the evaluation of scientific publishing vessels.
  • Panel Seven: Donors and international evaluation bodies and their role in promoting scientific research.
  • Panel Eight: Problems and Obstacles to Upgrade Publishing Containers in the Arab Countries and Ways of Addressing them.

People Concerned:

  • Researchers and university professors.
  • Managers and members of laboratories and scientific research units.
  • Directors and members of institutions that grant taxonomy and quality of scientific research.
  • Directors and members of research centers and specialized studies.
  • Postgraduate students

Commission:

Chief of Democratic Arabic Center

Bilal Al-Massry

Head of Conference:

Dr. Saad Elhadj Bendjakhdel

Chief of Academic Committee

 Dr. Sami Alwafi

General Supervisor

 Dr. Aicha Abbach

Chief of Organizing Committee

Dr. Mohamed Snoussi

Head of Media & Communication

 Dr. Shaimaa Al-Hawari

Members of Academic Committee:

  • Dr. Saleem Katie Ali, Baghdad Univeristy, Iraq
  • Dr. Hussiena Shroon, Muhammed Khiedr University, Algeria
  • Dr. Ameen Rija Dawas, Al-Kuwait University.
  • Dr. Alwash Fareed, Baskra University, Algeria.
  • Dr. Abdul-Haleem Bin Mishri, Baskra University, Algeria.
  • Dr. Bin Dawood Ibrahim, United Arab Emirates University.
  • Charaf Abdelhak, University of Tiaret, Algeria.
  • Mohammed Bukatib, First Mohammed University, Morocco.
  • Mostafa Khawas, National High School for Political Science, Algeria.
  • Aicha Abbach, University of Algeria, Algeria.
  • Alaa Mohammed Alabid Mutur, University of Isra, Palestine.
  • Ibrahim Alrifaai, Al-Manar University, Tunisia.
  • Rabih Khraifi, University of Jandoba, Tunisia.
  • Smati Hatem Tiaret University, Algeria.
  • Kareem Taweilt, Bijaia University, Algeria.
  • Muammer Salameh, Prince Muhammed Bin Fahad University, Saudi Arabia,
  • Muhamadi Buzina Amina, Hasiba binbu Ali University, Algeria.
  • Imrani Karbusa, Muhammed Kuider University, Algeria.
  • Hammum Farida, Muhammed Alsadeq bin Yahia University, Algeria.
  • Merzougui Mohamed, Tiaret University, Algeria.


Training Course

The Principles of Academic Review of Academic Research

On the sidelines of the International Conference, the Center organizes a free training course for the participants, entitled “The Principles of Academic Review of Academic Research”, with the presence of number of lecturers from various Arab and European universities. The course is a continuation of the conference’s aims and objectives.

The academic review of academic research is the most important way to assess and evaluate the academic output and quality examination and the extent of the researcher’s commitment to academic standards and controls. Review is the process of subjecting academic production to researchers for careful examination by experts to find and address the weaknesses. The academic review is the essence of research development.

Panels:

  • Panel One: Research methodology and methods of dealing with scientific knowledge.
  • Panel Two: Documentation and quotation controls in the preparation of scientific research.
  • Anel Three: Rules and Regulations of Academic Arbitration for Scientific Research.
  • Panel Four: Academic Arbitration Ethics for Scientific Research.
  • Panel Five: International Experiences in Academic Arbitration for Scientific Research.
  • Panel Six: Problems of academic arbitration for scientific research and ways of dealing with it.

Objectives:

  • Understand the concept, history and stages of the academic arbitration process
  • To recognize the importance of the process of academic arbitration for scientific research.
  • Recognition of the advantages and disadvantages of the process of academic arbitration of scientific research.
  • Identifying the modern methods of arbitration of scientific research.
  • Identify the impact of ICTs on the process, stages and patterns of the arbitration process.
  • Scientific methodology to address the problems of academic arbitration of scientific research.

People Concerned:

  • Managers and members of laboratories and scientific research units.
  • Directors and members of institutions that contribute to classifications and quality measurement of scientific research.
  • Directors and members of research centers and specialized studies.
  • Directors and editors of scientific journals.
  • Researchers and university professors.
  • Postgraduates.

Course Features:

  • Awarded a certificate from the German Democratic Center, the Arab Democratic Center and the Center for Surveys and Analysis.
  • Awarded a Researcher’s Certificate.
  • Acquire the scientific material of the course.
  • Specialized professors from Arab and European universities are giving lectures in the program.

To contact:

Email : contact@indexpolls.de

Email : indexpolls.de@gmail.com

اظهر المزيد

اترك تعليقاً

لن يتم نشر عنوان بريدك الإلكتروني. الحقول الإلزامية مشار إليها بـ *

إغلاق
%d مدونون معجبون بهذه: